Book Review: A Matter of Days: Resolving a Creation Controversy

Author: Hugh Ross
Spiritual Bias: Christian
Origins Bias: Old Earth Creationism
Rating: Middle of the Road+
Level: Basic

Comments: The "bad blood" that exists between young earth and old earth creationists is quite troubling to me. It is troubling to me as a Christian because God desires that we show unity as a body. In addition, this affects me personally, as I have been the target of attacks by many that hold to a young earth position. Given this, any book that could work to smooth this rift is of value to me. "A Matter of Days" by Hugh Ross is a book that documents the history of the creation date controversy, provides both scriptural and scientific evidence for support of an old earth, and proposes a rational and testable approach to dealing with this issue. The approach that he puts forth is to compare how well predictions associated with both young and old earth models measure up to scientific trends and discoveries. For example, a prediction of the old earth model is that evidences for the big bang will become more numerous and compelling whereas the young earth model predicts that evidences for the big bang will become fewer and weaker. Unfortunately, Ross's approach is effectively undermined by the fact that many young earth creationists are skeptical of science (especially in the areas of astronomy) and believe that the only reliable indicator of the creation date is the Bible (and in particular their young earth interpretation).

Overall, this book is well written, easily accessible and touches all of the angles involved. I would highly recommend this book for those on either side of the fence. However, if you're not a Christian, but have an interest in learning more about old earth creationism, try The Creator and the Cosmos instead.

Sample Quote(s): "Supposed "evidence" against the reliability of radiometric dating focuses on the method's "flaws" or inaccuracies when applied outside it limitations. For example, uranium-238 radiometric dating, when applied to young samples yields absurd dates. Why? With a half-life of 4.51 billion years, uranium-238 dating cannot be effective for measuring the age of any sample younger than a few hundred million years old. Similarly, carbon-14 dating will give absurd dates for extremely ancient samples."

"With rising hostilities on both sides of the creation-evolution controversy, defense of a recent creation has been growing more dogged. Many churches and Bible colleges now include belief in a young universe and a young earth in their statement of faith. In some cases, applicants who disagree are denied admission."